Well, you can delete them afterwards.I’d love to always check SDR and DV as well, but I’m trying to spare my KS internal HDD, sorry.
It is run by a group of enthusiastic Kaleidescape owners and dealers purely as a service to this community.
You can dismiss this box forever by clicking the "X" in the upper right corner of this message.
... but we strongly encourage you to register for a full account. There is no cost to register for a full account.
This box goes away for registered users.
Well, you can delete them afterwards.I’d love to always check SDR and DV as well, but I’m trying to spare my KS internal HDD, sorry.
Right, but those were all older HDR10 KScape encodes. Their latest HDR10 encodes seem far better compressed, so I assume the gap between DV, HDR10, and SDR is probably much smaller now. I’d love to always check SDR and DV as well, but I’m trying to spare my KS internal HDD, sorry.
Anyway, once they finally sort out the player’s block artifacts and completely stop messing with the colors, KS might finally live up to their so-called “reference quality” claims.
I found myself feeling the same way. While the audio improvement once I went to K was amazing....overall the video not so much...compared to disc or 1-1 rips. I too found things to be a tad "duller" with K...(dimmer and grainy). At first I thought it was my lamp or projector falling out of focus...but switching to the rip(Zidoo Z30 pro) of the very same movie proved otherwise. When I host movie night its never the PQ that I am showing off.I doubt more and more about K… i love how it works and the audio is insane and better then disc without a doubt.
Buttttttttt, the picture quality lacks often in compare with the 4k uhd blu ray disc.
I have the strato V but i also have a Zappiti Reference CineMike and when i rip 1:1 4k uhd discs of the same movies i have on Kscape the K is always i tiny bit darker… a tiny bit less sharp… and it has almost always have more grain overlay. And like Rmarcie said many times the ratio is a bit cropped.
Every movie looks better on my Zappiti and i dont like that at all. I am a bit in doubt what to do next because i really really love the audio side of Kaleidescape.
Really hope K reads this stuff.
Is there any reason to watch the HDR version if it is SDR in an HDR container? I'd imagine tone mapping issues could be a reason not to...
Are you saying you´re getting better audio using K compared to disk (or 1:1 rip)?While the audio improvement once I went to K was amazing....overall the video not so much...compared to disc or 1-1 rips.
IMHO, you need at least 200nits for HDR to look like HDR.Given my screen size and throw distance...I am at the extreme limit for HDR brightness.
Only when the lamp is brand new does HDR look like HDR![]()
Yeah, information I knew nothing about when I picked projector and screen =PIMHO, you need at least 200nits for HDR to look like HDR.
That isn't really true either because unless you have a good black floor 200 nits will still lack dynamic range. This is why I find it so funny that people that use projectors that didn't even have good dynamic range for SDR somehow think they now are good for HDR simply because they are brighter when in reality they are just making it even worse. 200 nits for a projection system looks fine if you have enough dynamic range to make it actually look good for contrast, but the amount of projectors that can do 200 nits on my HT screens and still have a reasonably good black floor are few and far between unless you are working with a pretty small screen. It is the fallacy that HDR is about being bright, which is not the point at all.IMHO, you need at least 200nits for HDR to look like HDR.





Well, when a sentence starts with "IMHO" it doesn´t make sense to answer with "that isn´t true".That isn't really true either because unless you have a good black floor 200 nits will still lack dynamic range.




I have debated starting to build an itunes library instead of investing in a kscape. From a video perspective, when playing itunes things on an Apple TV for the higher bitrate (I know you said this one was 24mbps), can you tell a giant difference in video quality? Or do you find the majority of the difference is on the audio side?One Battle After Another 2025
kscape vs itunes vs Movies Anywhere | Slowpoke Pics
Slowpoke Pics image comparison serviceslow.pics
- Good compression, but the real test will be against the UHD-BD in January. Pretty good example of how MA struggles with grainy content and how iTunes denoises everything. MA and iTunes both have the same 24mbps bitrate.
* Another SDR in HDR container grade but this has nothing to do with KScape encoding...
View attachment 9088
View attachment 9089
View attachment 9090
View attachment 9091
View attachment 9092
![]()
One Battle After Another
An ex-revolutionary and his daughter go on the run when a deranged colonel finds out where they went into hiding. Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson. Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Benicio del Toro, and Regina Hall. Purchase and download today in 4K Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos audio.www.kaleidescape.com
The: AppleTV X ...might be close to what you're describing. Sspecial thanks to forum member Steve Bruzonsky for originally telling me about this. I do not have one, but reading the technical specs - from an engineering perspective it makes sense.I have debated starting to build an itunes library instead of investing in a kscape. From a video perspective, when playing itunes things on an Apple TV for the higher bitrate (I know you said this one was 24mbps), can you tell a giant difference in video quality? Or do you find the majority of the difference is on the audio side?
There is a big part of me that really wishes Apple would just release a version of Apple TV with larger onboard storage like 1tb and start offering a download option to play at disc quality like kscape. I guess they just think such a small percentage of the userbase would use it that they don't do it.
The: AppleTV X ...might be close to what you're describing. Sspecial thanks to forum member Steve Bruzonsky for originally telling me about this. I do not have one, but reading the technical specs - from an engineering perspective it makes sense.
It's unlikely that Apple has a strong business case to go the reference audiophile/videophile route as they need to rely on much greater financial gains each year to reach their revenue and profit targets to appease Wall Street. Apple Home, Wearibles, and Accessories (of which Apple TV box is a small part) collectively makes up less than 10% of Apple revenue as of end of 2024.
I really like Kaleidescape over all other solutions as they demonstrate a commitment to continued innovation and improvement year in and year out. It's also cool to see Tayloe and team take constructive feedback from this forum and others as they proceed. Seeing the focus on adding new Kaleidescape users with lower priced (not to be confused with "low") hardware solutions indicates a keen focus on optimizing cash flow to ensure continued possibility for dollars to invest in innovation. I also see their customer service and technical support tas world class.
All that said, appreciate you and the others highlighting areas for improvement on quality as it helps continue to push the envelope toward the best reference possible vs. merely settling for good enough.
What defective players are you describing? I might have missed something.I agree with most of that. Unfortunately these issues were pointed out in July and here we are with defective players 5 months later. No way can I say technical and customer service is world class as it’s going to be even more months to go to have these issues resolved. And the defective players we have aren’t $500.00… $2000 or even 3k … but more expensive.