• Thanks for visiting the Kaleidescape Owners' Forum

    This forum is for the community of Kaleidescape owners, and others interested in learning about the system, equipment, services, and the company itself.

    It is run by a group of enthusiastic Kaleidescape owners and dealers purely as a service to this community.

    This board is not affiliated in any way with Kaleidescape, Inc.
    For official technical support, product information, or customer service, please visit www.kaleidescape.com

    You can dismiss this box forever by clicking the "X" in the upper right corner of this message.
  • You are currently in "Guest" mode and not logged in with a registered account.

    The forum is free to use and most of the forum can be used by guests who are not registered....

    ... but we strongly encourage you to register for a full account. There is no cost to register for a full account.

    Benefits of registering for a full account:

    • Participate in the discussions! You must have a registered account to make posts on the forums. You will be able to start your own thread on a topic or question, or you can reply to other threads/discussions.
    • Use the "Conversation" feature (known as "private messaging" on other forums) to communicate directly with any of the other users here.
    • Access the Files area. The "resources" area of the forum contains many "Favorite Scene" and Script files that can dramatically increase the enjoyment of your Kaleidescape system. Go directly to great scenes in your favorite movies, created by other owners, and add automation to playback of your system with Scripts.
    • You won't see this annoying notice at the top of every screen!😊

    It's easy and free to register for the forum. Just click the "Register" button in the upper right corner of this page, and follow the instructions there.

    This box goes away for registered users.

[Buyer’s Guide] Kaleidescape Quality Compared to Blu-ray & other Digital Sources

What I wanted to say is, that it looks the same for me. Terrible, but the same.
 
I would hope you aren't using your speakers to view those images :LOL:
You're a really funny guy. 😆
I´m looking at my screen in my cinema room, playing JW1 on my Strato C and from UHD and this is what I see. Just saying that both look terrible.

IMG_9072.JPEGIMG_9071.JPEG
 
Well , we can see the DNR on your images too.
Anyway, what you think you see and taking a picture of your screen is irrelevant when I post a lossless HDMI capture of the video.
 
Is the top one K? Looks like DNR to me, although a photo from the phone isn't as good as those direct grabs.
I learned what you can see on these photos is irrelevant so let´s leave it there.
 
I´m not denying @Rmarci´s findings, just saying on a screen moving in real life, both look very similar and both terrible. No need to go into defense mode with every comment coming in.
Isn't it more defensive not to tell people which image is K and which is BD, once people point out that you can see DNR in one of the images?
 
I learned what you can see on these photos is irrelevant so let´s leave it there.
Unless you’re using a DSLR on a tripod with all settings fully locked and you can capture the exact same frame from both sources then yes, phone photos are 100% irrelevant.

Here’s what a proper camera comparison looks like:
DV vs HDR10 (LG G5), same frame, DSLR on tripod with locked settings.

 
Isn't it more defensive not to tell people which image is K and which is BD, once people point out that you can see DNR in one of the images?
Well, I didn´t find it too interesting which one is which as my point was more to show how bad both are looking. But yes, if it makes you happy, the first one is K. But as I said it looks very similar and it´s a movie, the next second might look exactly the other way round.
 
Unless you’re using a DSLR on a tripod with all settings fully locked and you can capture the exact same frame from both sources then yes, phone photos are 100% irrelevant.
As long as the photos represent good enough what I´m seeing on my screen, it´s fine for me. That it´s not good enough to do a scientific comparison, that should be clear.
 
Well, I didn´t find it too interesting which one is which as my point was more to show how bad both are looking. But yes, if it makes you happy, the first one is K. But as I said it looks very similar and it´s a movie, the next second might look exactly the other way round.

If you would enjoy posting many images so we can demonstrate spotting the DNR is pretty easy, that would be a fun game for me at least.

It amazes me that people will say they hear small differences in audio, from things like clean power, but when we have images that you can literally toggle between and see the differences people will say both look equally bad. We can see these differences on a phone screen, a computer screen, let alone an oled TV or quality projector.
 
As long as the photos represent good enough what I´m seeing on my screen,

Well, you said you didn’t see a difference, yet your non-scientific image shows obvious DNR… that’s a bit contradictory.

1774026342948.gif
 
Well, you said you didn’t see a difference, yet your non-scientific image shows obvious DNR… that’s a bit contradictory.
Well, you just said my photos are irrelevant, now you´re trying to prove your point using them. That´s a bit contradictory. ;)
I try to explain my point again:
I don´t think that a normal viewer from a normal viewing disrance is able to distinguish between the perceived image with the DNR applied (again, not denying it is there and I agree, it shouldn´t be there) and without. Somebody will respond now to that that I´m trying to downplay the issue - I´m not. K shouldn´t apply DNR in it´s workflow. I´m just trying to put it into perspective.
And did I say K should not apply DNR to the library? If not, then I say K should not apply DNR to their library.
 
Well, you just said my photos are irrelevant, now you´re trying to prove your point using them. That´s a bit contradictory.
What ? Do you have reading issues?

I was replying to what you said about your image representing what you are seeing and your images show a grain difference... you're the one contradicting yoursefl here, not me

Those images are still 100% useless, and the only point I'm making here is that you're contradicting yourself.
 
Last edited:
I hope we'll keep this discussion relevant and respectful. I personally appreciate the scientific work and detailed technical analysis @Rmarci is doing, and I can appreciate and welcome the subjective opinions and non-scientific images that @DieZwei (and others) are offering.
I hope we can de-escalate a bit and not let this get into personal attacks and hyper-parsing of every word in a previous post. I fully realize now I'm wading into this, which I've tried to avoid, and opening myself up now to accusations of something or another.

Keep the discussions going; both objective and subjective views here are welcomed.
 
Back
Top