MattyDaddy76
Member
No. It was on dv on a Strato V.Did you watch it in 4K C?
It is run by a group of enthusiastic Kaleidescape owners and dealers purely as a service to this community.
You can dismiss this box forever by clicking the "X" in the upper right corner of this message.
... but we strongly encourage you to register for a full account. There is no cost to register for a full account.
This box goes away for registered users.
No. It was on dv on a Strato V.Did you watch it in 4K C?
Thanks and well said. As I mentioned, later in the movie I noticed much better quality.. it was just something in the opening scenes that her face looked really soft. (Also I had expectations going into it). I bought it so I can rewatch and maybe mess with some settings. Maybe I’ll try the hdr version also.For whatever it's worth, I watched the HDR10 version of Supergirl tonight, with a Strato C. My theater gear is in my signature.
I thought the picture quality was, at times, exceptional, with great detail and colors, along with great blacks and contrast. But like any other movie, some scenes certainly looked softer, with much less contrast. It's just the nature of the beast - because one scene can be quite different from others in terms of lighting, whether it's a wide angle view of action, or a close-up of a person's face and clothing, there are going to be marked differences in the image.
So overall I really enjoyed the picture quality, and I've come to expect that not every scene is going to have the same level of detail, sharpness, and contrast.
I'm with you there. I didn't enjoy Superman at all. I'm a comics fan but by no means a Superman fan but this was just a waste of time. I'm tired of Gunn's Mommy/Daddy issue trope.I just didn’t enjoy Superman (2025) at all, so I guess I’m starting with a very low bar..lol. I’m not used to seeing my iconic heroes having their a$$ kicked throughout the film. Lol. Having grown up with the late great C.Reeve Superman movies, this was a culture shock to say the least. Henry Cavill was a nice alternative as well.
I’m still looking forward to watching Supergirl since the preliminary feedback appears to be favorable towards the HT aspects of the presentation. I’m all in for a good HT experience (audio and PQ). Plus I’m an unapologetic DC fan.
Its interesting....even when word of Supergirls flop at the box office came out..i was still interested in watching it...as I normally do not listen to reviewers..in fact the more they hate something the more I am usually interested in it. But then i kept reading all the stuff Gunn and whatever her face is (writer) trying to defend its failure were putting out and blaming the fans...I became less and less interested...to the point I will simply never watch it. Never thought I would say this but I miss the Snyder DCEUI'm with you there. I didn't enjoy Superman at all. I'm a comics fan but by no means a Superman fan but this was just a waste of time. I'm tired of Gunn's Mommy/Daddy issue trope.
I have 0 interest in Supergirl. I'll have to be mighty bored and have absolutely nothing else to watch before I start up Supergirl.
Have you read the source comic?I didn't care for Supergirl and my issues were driven by character, story, and structure. Spoilers...
We're introduced to a clearly damaged alcoholic that doesn't seem to care about anyone or anything outside of her dog. Throughout the film we see flashbacks and she repeatedly prevents killing as revenge due to what it does to the perpetrator. Obviously, the flashbacks are building towards her killing someone resulting in the current state of her character. But, no. In fact, at the climax of the film she kills the villain while he's laying prone on the ground, then goes back to being a hero and returning to Earth. Because murder in cold blood heals all wounds? Honestly, I sat staring at the screen just absolutely baffled.
The movie was infamous for poor test screenings, re-writes, and re-shoots, but somehow this was the best version of this story? Was the script this terrible? Speaking of which, Lobo's constant presence didn't help me. His first appearance was an obvious cameo ending with a zinger. Great, fine, cool. Then he keeps showing up? For no reason? Obvious products of the aforementioned rewrites/reshoots, but again how bad was the original script? Anyway, in the end I didn't care about Supergirl, I don't even remember the sidekick, and I'm less interested in a Lobo movie. Great work,Warner/DC.
I here the same woman that wrote the screenplay for Supergirl 2026 is on tap for new DCEUs Wonder Woman....ouch.I didn't care for Supergirl and my issues were driven by character, story, and structure. Spoilers...
We're introduced to a clearly damaged alcoholic that doesn't seem to care about anyone or anything outside of her dog. Throughout the film we see flashbacks and she repeatedly prevents killing as revenge due to what it does to the perpetrator. Obviously, the flashbacks are building towards her killing someone resulting in the current state of her character. But, no. In fact, at the climax of the film she kills the villain while he's laying prone on the ground, then goes back to being a hero and returning to Earth. Because murder in cold blood heals all wounds? Honestly, I sat staring at the screen just absolutely baffled.
The movie was infamous for poor test screenings, re-writes, and re-shoots, but somehow this was the best version of this story? Was the script this terrible? Speaking of which, Lobo's constant presence didn't help me. His first appearance was an obvious cameo ending with a zinger. Great, fine, cool. Then he keeps showing up? For no reason? Obvious products of the aforementioned rewrites/reshoots, but again how bad was the original script? Anyway, in the end I didn't care about Supergirl, I don't even remember the sidekick, and I'm less interested in a Lobo movie. Great work,Warner/DC.
I didn't care for Supergirl and my issues were driven by character, story, and structure. Spoilers...
We're introduced to a clearly damaged alcoholic that doesn't seem to care about anyone or anything outside of her dog. Throughout the film we see flashbacks and she repeatedly prevents killing as revenge due to what it does to the perpetrator. Obviously, the flashbacks are building towards her killing someone resulting in the current state of her character. But, no. In fact, at the climax of the film she kills the villain while he's laying prone on the ground, then goes back to being a hero and returning to Earth. Because murder in cold blood heals all wounds? Honestly, I sat staring at the screen just absolutely baffled.
The movie was infamous for poor test screenings, re-writes, and re-shoots, but somehow this was the best version of this story? Was the script this terrible? Speaking of which, Lobo's constant presence didn't help me. His first appearance was an obvious cameo ending with a zinger. Great, fine, cool. Then he keeps showing up? For no reason? Obvious products of the aforementioned rewrites/reshoots, but again how bad was the original script? Anyway, in the end I didn't care about Supergirl, I don't even remember the sidekick, and I'm less interested in a Lobo movie. Great work,Warner/DC.
Girl empowering movies are great for everyone if they are not preaching and insulting people who are genuinely interested in the product. Hollywood as of late wants to get up in front of their core audience and tell them what they should think or believe. I'm sorry, I'm here for entertainment. If you are here to try and spread some sort of gospel, no thanks. Not what I'm paying for.This should make one think:
The Supergirl 2026 writer said something to the effect that "she wanted to make a female empowering movie, one that mothers would want to take their daughters too".