It is run by a group of enthusiastic Kaleidescape owners and dealers purely as a service to this community.
You can dismiss this box forever by clicking the "X" in the upper right corner of this message.
... but we strongly encourage you to register for a full account. There is no cost to register for a full account.
This box goes away for registered users.
Some of that is already available in Cinematic 4K i.e. The Madison and House of Dragons. Don't know the answer though.I know that virtually all movies will be sent at 23.976 or 24 fps. But what about "TV" content (Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Planet Earth, Yellowstone, etc.), or possibly Movie Concerts/Live Performances? I would think that at least some of this might be 59.94 or 60 fps, as that is the standard for broadcast TV (at least in the U.S.).
The context for my question is that if/when any of this content become available in Cinematic 4k/HDR10 format, with 4:4:4 chroma, then at least theoretically the component receiving the signal from the Strato K would need to support HDMI 2.1.
Any information on this?
With 8 bit color depth, yes. With 10bit, it would already be beyong 18gbps (20gbps).I suspect you need 18gbps bandwidth which should be well within the purview of hdmi 2.0, but I could be wrong.
I'm still interested in knowing whether or not there is any Kaleidescape Cinematic content that would be 59.94 (or 60) fps native, sent with 4k resolution and 4:4:4 chroma. This would exceed HDMI 2.0 bandwidth, necessitating an HDMI 2.1 device on the receiving end.I know that virtually all movies will be sent at 23.976 or 24 fps. But what about "TV" content (Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Planet Earth, Yellowstone, etc.), or possibly Movie Concerts/Live Performances? I would think that at least some of this might be 59.94 or 60 fps, as that is the standard for broadcast TV (at least in the U.S.).
The context for my question is that if/when any of this content become available in Cinematic 4k/HDR10 format, with 4:4:4 chroma, then at least theoretically the component receiving the signal from the Strato K would need to support HDMI 2.1.
Any information on this?
I can test it since I own it, but we'll have to wait and see if they upgrade it to Cinematic. I only have the Envy Core without the Premium package, so it should not work currently in 60fps.The only 60 frames per second movie I I’ve watched in Kaleidescape is Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk and it’s not in Cinematic yet.
Most high quality TV content is produced in 23.98/24fps and only receives a pulldown if/when necessary at the point of transmission. They’re not creating distribution files from a broadcast recording.I know that virtually all movies will be sent at 23.976 or 24 fps. But what about "TV" content (Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Planet Earth, Yellowstone, etc.), or possibly Movie Concerts/Live Performances? I would think that at least some of this might be 59.94 or 60 fps, as that is the standard for broadcast TV (at least in the U.S.).
The context for my question is that if/when any of this content become available in Cinematic 4k/HDR10 format, with 4:4:4 chroma, then at least theoretically the component receiving the signal from the Strato K would need to support HDMI 2.1.
Any information on this?
The general statement is that one doesn't need an HDMI 2.1 capable audio processor in order to get the best output from the Strato K. I'm just trying to determine if there are exceptions that might require that statement to be qualified according to the content.

Thanks for this. And yes, the bandwidth limitations are real with HDMI 2.0 vs 2.1, although it is interesting that even in this scenario, the content will still play, and just drop frame rate from 60 to 30 fps. That in turn raises another interesting question - would that change be readily perceptible if it did occur?!I don't know what's out there in terms of actual real-world content, but I will say that if you hook it up to an HDMI 2.0 receiver, the web settings UI does note that 4K Cinematic 60fps content will drop down to 30fps, so this isn't purely theoretical, it's an official Kaleidescape-acknowledged limitation of HDMI 2.0:
View attachment 11574
I don´t think that´s a valid conclusion.Thanks for this. And yes, the bandwidth limitations are real with HDMI 2.0 vs 2.1, although it is interesting that even in this scenario, the content will still play, and just drop frame rate from 60 to 30 fps.
Good point. I'm not in a position to test this as I don't have a Strato K.I don´t think that´s a valid conclusion.
I think it just means that it won´t play content >24/30Hz at all.
The standard behaviour of Strato players up to now is that they don´t play what´s not listed there. I don´t expect that to have changed with the K.Good point. I'm not in a position to test this as I don't have a Strato K.
If someone can identify some Cinematic 4k/4:4:4 content that is native 60 fps (or 59.94) and try playing this through a processor that has an HDMI 2.0 input, that would give us the answer. Will it simply not play, or will it reduce frame rate?
That's a reasonable assumption. I'd still be interested in empirical confirmation.The standard behaviour of Strato players up to now is that they don´t play what´s not listed there. I don´t expect that to have changed with the K.