Just to understand: with what exactly in my post do you disagree?Again I’ll respectfully disagree. But thanks for the insight.
It is run by a group of enthusiastic Kaleidescape owners and dealers purely as a service to this community.
You can dismiss this box forever by clicking the "X" in the upper right corner of this message.
... but we strongly encourage you to register for a full account. There is no cost to register for a full account.
This box goes away for registered users.
Just to understand: with what exactly in my post do you disagree?Again I’ll respectfully disagree. But thanks for the insight.
OK, thanks for clarifying. Your observation has nothing to do with displaying 8K content or the ability of a lens to display 8K pixel on a screen.Of the observable image quality difference on the current line of high end JVC 8K e-shift. I’ve experienced it with K-scape material (I don’t think this was on an K player but I can’t say for certain) and subjectively, could immediately tell the better quality image over a standard 4K image. Is it true 8K no, but it’s better in my opinion.
I really don’t want to come off as argumentative but if that was the case, all the pixel shifting 4K DLP projectors would be unable to claim 4K resolution. This is also the reason why I shop for true 4K projectors. Just by your logic.OK, thanks for clarifying. Your observation has nothing to do with displaying 8K content or the ability of a lens to display 8K pixel on a screen.
It´s just that the shifting mechanism can create an image that appears to be more even as the fillrate increases due to the shifted pixels.
Yeah, but you said when you saw it, you saw it with 4K content, not 8K content. So the better image you say you´ve perceived was because of the projector shifting and not because the source was better. It was still 4K.I really don’t want to come off as argumentative but if that was the case, all the pixel shifting 4K DLP projectors would be unable to claim 4K resolution. This is also the reason why I shop for true 4K projectors. Just by your logic.
With the K player outputting 8K, to a 8K pixel shifter, is still by definition by the industry, as 8K resolution. No?
Yes. It was from TG:Maverick.Yeah, but you said when you saw it, you saw it with 4K content, not 8K content. So the better image you say you´ve perceived was because of the projector shifting and not because the source was better. It was still 4K.
I really don’t want to come off as argumentative but if that was the case, all the pixel shifting 4K DLP projectors would be unable to claim 4K resolution. This is also the reason why I shop for true 4K projectors. Just by your logic.
With the K player outputting 8K, to a 8K pixel shifter, is still by definition by the industry, as 8K resolution. No?
Thanks. Yeah at Best Biy they were using K-scape and you could play just about anything you like. No BR:2049.So the DLP thing is tricky to me. Same with the Epson LCDs. I do like the shifting they are doing as they do make for a better image. BUT the pixel grid or outline structure is still there and on really bright scenes kills the magic trick of the pixel shifting for me. It makes the resolution look even lower than it actually is.
So it's kind of both. You are getting the 4k image sent to the screen. You can use the slow motion video capture on your phone to see how that works. But they still aren't actually 4k chips and at times it is very noticeable on large screens.
I've only seen actual 8k content while at a convention where JVC was showing off the NZ900 and it was probably the best projected image I have seen. I am not sure how much that would translate to home use as they had their own special demo clips playing on rotation. But it was very impressive.
But also dependent in the light control and room.So the DLP thing is tricky to me. Same with the Epson LCDs. I do like the shifting they are doing as they do make for a better image. BUT the pixel grid or outline structure is still there and on really bright scenes kills the magic trick of the pixel shifting for me. It makes the resolution look even lower than it actually is.
So it's kind of both. You are getting the 4k image sent to the screen. You can use the slow motion video capture on your phone to see how that works. But they still aren't actually 4k chips and at times it is very noticeable on large screens.
I've only seen actual 8k content while at a convention where JVC was showing off the NZ900 and it was probably the best projected image I have seen. I am not sure how much that would translate to home use as they had their own special demo clips playing on rotation. But it was very impressive.
My room is completely light controlled. I’m also not interested in DLP technology or anything that they’re doing. I am actually a true 4K fan.But also dependent in the light control and room.
I don't understand what you're saying. What does 4K have to do with DLP and light control? I was commenting on your impression of the overall image. A number of people can't get that same impressive image with or without pixel shifting because they don't have a complete bat cave hence they have higher black levels and less contrast.My room is completely light controlled. I’m also not interested in DLP technology or anything that they’re doing. I am actually a true 4K fan.
I ordered an NZ500. I pick it up Friday/Saturday.
Doing my research the throw distance and zoom is close to 1.07? I think?I hope you got the $1,000 off sale price that ended on 9/30?!
![]()
#jvc #jvcprojectors #hometheater #homecinemaprojectors #dila #native4k #8k | JVC
Elevate your cinematic experience with exclusive promotional pricing on select JVC Home Theater projectors. Enjoy $1,000 off the Native 4K DLA-NZ500 and DLA-NZ700 models, or take $2,000 off the 8K DLA-NZ800 for unmatched black levels and native contrast. Reach out to your local dealer today to...www.linkedin.com
I also hope your dealer confirmed your throw distance will work with the NZ500?
The NZ500 will be easy to re-sell when 8K content hits and you want to make a move.
Doing my research the throw distance and zoom is close to 1.07? I think?
Also, I know the NZ800 and 900 do a great job at e-shift, I won't be upgrading until 8K hits native projectors.
-JD-
Yeah, that's why I bought the N500 because I don't see 8K projectors coming any time soon.Unless you have easy placement flexibility, I’d double check if your ES350 placement will also work for the NZ500. A good dealer would work through that with you.
If you’re waiting for native 8K for JVC (no eShift), it might be a long wait. I hope I’m wrong. Another future route for you is that once JVC announces their next gen, you may be able to sell the NZ500 and pickup a used NZ800/NZ900 for a good price to get to 8K.
Yeah, that's why I bought the N500 because I don't see 8K projectors coming any time soon.